首页> 外文OA文献 >Clinimetric evaluation of active range of motion measures in patients with non-specific neck pain: a systematic review
【2h】

Clinimetric evaluation of active range of motion measures in patients with non-specific neck pain: a systematic review

机译:临床非活动性颈痛患者活动范围活动度的斜度评估:系统评价

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The study is to provide a critical analysis of the research literature on clinimetric properties of instruments that can be used in daily practice to measure active cervical range of motion (ACROM) in patients with non-specific neck pain. A computerized literature search was performed in Medline, Cinahl and Embase from 1982 to January 2007. Two reviewers independently assessed the clinimetric properties of identified instruments using a criteria list. The search identified a total of 33 studies, investigating three different types of measurement instruments to determine ACROM. These instruments were: (1) different types of goniometers/inclinometers, (2) visual estimation, and (3) tape measurements. Intra- and inter-observer reliability was demonstrated for the cervical range of motion instrument (CROM), Cybex electronic digital instrument (EDI-320) and a single inclinometer. The presence of agreement was assessed for the EDI-320 and a single inclinometer. The CROM received a positive rating for construct validity. When clinical acceptability is taken into account both the CROM and the single inclinometer can be considered appropriate instruments for measuring the active range of motion in patients with non-specific neck pain in daily practice. Reliability is the aspect most frequently evaluated. Agreement, validity and responsiveness are documented less frequently.
机译:这项研究将对有关器械的斜度特性的研究文献进行批判性分析,这些仪器可在日常实践中用于测量非特异性颈部疼痛患者的主动颈椎活动范围(ACROM)。从1982年到2007年1月,在Medline,Cinahl和Embase进行了计算机文献检索。两名评价员使用标准列表独立评估了所鉴定仪器的斜度特性。搜索共确定了33项研究,调查了三种不同类型的测量仪器以确定ACROM。这些仪器是:(1)不同类型的测角仪/倾角仪;(2)视觉估计;(3)磁带测量。颈内运动器械(CROM),Cybex电子数字器械(EDI-320)和单个测斜仪证明了观察者内部和观察者之间的可靠性。对于EDI-320和单个测斜仪,评估是否存在协议。 CROM在构建体有效性方面获得了肯定的评价。当考虑到临床可接受性时,CROM和单个测斜仪都可以被认为是在日常实践中测量非特异性颈部疼痛患者活动范围的合适工具。可靠性是最经常评估的方面。一致性,有效性和响应性的文件记录频率较低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号